Best practices for extending the Array<T> in typescript

Question

Best practices for extending the Array<T> in typescript

In a discussion on extending the Static String Class in Typescript, I came across an example showing how we can extend existing base classes in typescript by adding new methods.

interface StringConstructor {
   isNullOrEmpty(str:string):boolean;
}
String.isNullOrEmpty = (str:string) => !str;

This example worked perfectly for me. However, when it came to creating a generic interface and adding a new method like 'contain()' to an Array, I faced some challenges. Here's what I tried:

//1
interface Array<T> {
    contain(item: T): boolean;
}  
//2
?????? = (item: T) => {
// ....
    return true;
};

After adding the first step, I saw 'contain' method appearing in VS intellisense, but I couldn't figure out where to actually implement this method. Any suggestions?

typescript

Answer 1

Answer №1

When working with the interface definition already linked to the generic constraint, the implementation allows you to treat it as any type:

interface Array<T> {
    contain(item: T): boolean;
}  

Array.prototype.contain = function(item) {
    return this.some(obj => item == obj);
};

It's important not to use arrow functions for prototype methods, which can lead to unexpected results:

interface Array<T> {
    fn(): void;
}

Array.prototype.fn = () => {
    console.log(this);
};

let a = [];
a.fn(); // Window

Instead, use regular functions like this:

Array.prototype.fn = function() {
    console.log(this);
};

let a = [];
a.fn(); // []

If your target is es5 or lower, the compiler will translate arrow functions into regular ones. However, if you switch to targeting es6 without changing arrow functions in your code, it may break and be difficult to troubleshoot.

Answer 2

When working with the interface definition already linked to the generic constraint, the implementation allows you to treat it as any type:

interface Array<T> {
    contain(item: T): boolean;
}  

Array.prototype.contain = function(item) {
    return this.some(obj => item == obj);
};

It's important not to use arrow functions for prototype methods, which can lead to unexpected results:

interface Array<T> {
    fn(): void;
}

Array.prototype.fn = () => {
    console.log(this);
};

let a = [];
a.fn(); // Window

Instead, use regular functions like this:

Array.prototype.fn = function() {
    console.log(this);
};

let a = [];
a.fn(); // []

If your target is es5 or lower, the compiler will translate arrow functions into regular ones. However, if you switch to targeting es6 without changing arrow functions in your code, it may break and be difficult to troubleshoot.

Best practices for extending the Array<T> in typescript

Answer №1

Similar questions

In TypeScript, values other than numbers or strings can be accepted as parameters, even when the expected type is a

What does the typeof keyword return when used with a variable in Typescript?

Use the useEffect hook to pass newly updated data to a FlatList component

Exploring the incorporation of interfaces into Vue.js/Typescript for variables. Tips?

What is the best way to prevent the hassle of manually reloading a VS Code extension each time I make updates

Attempting to authenticate with Next.js using JWT in a middleware is proving to be unsuccessful

Testing onClick using Jest when it is not a callback function in props

Next.js Version 13 - Unable to find solution for 'supports-color' conflict

Struggling with Primeng's KeyFilter functionality?

Simplifying parameter types for error handling in app.use callback with Express.js and TypeScript

Is it possible to pass parameters from a base class's constructor to a child class?

What are the steps for importing KnockOut 4 in TypeScript?

Is there a user-friendly interface in Typescript for basic dictionaries?

Angular checkbox filtering for tables

Do you have an index.d.ts file available for canonical-json?

What are the steps to incorporate a type-safe builder using phantom types in TypeScript?

The type definition file for 'bson' could not be located. It appears to be missing from the program due to being the entry point for the implicit type library 'bson'

Typescript polymorphism allows for the ability to create various

Enhance your Next.js routing by appending to a slug/url using the <Link> component

What is the best way to bring a local package into another npm package and verify its functionality using Typescript?