Implementing Angular 4 setTimeout() function with dynamic delay and wait periods

Question

Implementing Angular 4 setTimeout() function with dynamic delay and wait periods

My task involves managing a list of events that each have a specific timestamp. I am looking to display these events in the order of their timestamps.

To introduce a delay between events:

delay = timestamp(t+1) - timstamp(t)

I understand that implementing this with setTimeout may not be ideal, especially when the delay is not constant. However, there might be a workaround available for situations where the timeout remains constant, which is not the case for me.

Is it feasible to ensure that the next setTimeout() only triggers after the previous one has completed? For instance, if the first setTimeout() has a 5-second delay and the second one 3 seconds, the latter will execute before the former. My goal is to maintain the order specified by the timestamps while ensuring sequential execution.

The example provided illustrates how this can work with a fixed delay, but my scenario requires dynamically calculating the delay based on the event data obtained from iterating through the list.

for (i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) {
  setDelay(i);
}

function setDelay(i) {
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log(i);
  }, 1000);
}

javascript angular typescript

Answer 1

Answer №1

If you want to achieve a similar result, you can utilize an IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression) combined with function recursion as shown below:

let counter = 0;
(function repeat(){
  if (++counter > 5) return;
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log("Iteration: " + counter);
    repeat();
  }, 5000);
})();

Check out the live example on JSFiddle here.

Answer 2

If you want to achieve a similar result, you can utilize an IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression) combined with function recursion as shown below:

let counter = 0;
(function repeat(){
  if (++counter > 5) return;
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log("Iteration: " + counter);
    repeat();
  }, 5000);
})();

Check out the live example on JSFiddle here.

Answer 3

Answer №2

It is not advisable to include this code snippet within a loop because the setTimeout function will not wait for completion.

An alternate approach would be to create a list of time intervals that you wish to wait for, and then iterate through them recursively:

let delays = [5000, 3000, 1000];

function delayExecution(times) {
  if (times.length > 0) {
    // Extract the first interval from the array
    let duration = times.shift();
    console.log("Waiting", duration);
    
    // Pause execution for the specified duration
    setTimeout(() => {
        console.log("Waited ", duration);
        // Execute the delayExecution function again with the remaining intervals
        delayExecution(times);
    }, duration);
  }
}

delayExecution(delays);

Answer 4

It is not advisable to include this code snippet within a loop because the setTimeout function will not wait for completion.

An alternate approach would be to create a list of time intervals that you wish to wait for, and then iterate through them recursively:

let delays = [5000, 3000, 1000];

function delayExecution(times) {
  if (times.length > 0) {
    // Extract the first interval from the array
    let duration = times.shift();
    console.log("Waiting", duration);
    
    // Pause execution for the specified duration
    setTimeout(() => {
        console.log("Waited ", duration);
        // Execute the delayExecution function again with the remaining intervals
        delayExecution(times);
    }, duration);
  }
}

delayExecution(delays);

Answer 5

Answer №3

When utilizing the most recent Typescript or ES code, async/await becomes a great solution.

let timeIntervals = [3, 2, 4];

(async () => {
  for (let interval of timeIntervals) {
    await delay(interval * 1000);
    console.log('waited: ' + interval);
  }
})();

function delay(ms) {
    return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms));
}

In order to utilize await, we must encapsulate the for loop within an immediately invoked async function.

A timeout function is also necessary to return a promise upon completing the specified timeout duration.

Subsequently, we wait for the timeout to finish before proceeding with the loop iterations.

Answer 6

When utilizing the most recent Typescript or ES code, async/await becomes a great solution.

let timeIntervals = [3, 2, 4];

(async () => {
  for (let interval of timeIntervals) {
    await delay(interval * 1000);
    console.log('waited: ' + interval);
  }
})();

function delay(ms) {
    return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms));
}

In order to utilize await, we must encapsulate the for loop within an immediately invoked async function.

A timeout function is also necessary to return a promise upon completing the specified timeout duration.

Subsequently, we wait for the timeout to finish before proceeding with the loop iterations.

Answer 7

Answer №4

Adjust the time-out duration based on the dynamic value of i. Here's an example:

for (let i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) {
  customizeTimeout(i);
}

function customizeTimeout(i) {
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log(i);
  }, i*1000);
}

Answer 8

Adjust the time-out duration based on the dynamic value of i. Here's an example:

for (let i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) {
  customizeTimeout(i);
}

function customizeTimeout(i) {
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log(i);
  }, i*1000);
}

Answer 9

Answer №5

Consider the following approach:

initializeDelay(1, 5);

function initializeDelay(counter, maximum) {
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log(counter);
    if(counter < maximum){
      counter++;
      initializeDelay(counter, maximum);
    }
  }, 1000);
}

The concept here is to set the next setTimeout(.. within a timeout. Feel free to adjust it and change the duration of timeouts as needed.

Hopefully this explanation is helpful :)

Answer 10

Consider the following approach:

initializeDelay(1, 5);

function initializeDelay(counter, maximum) {
  setTimeout(function(){
    console.log(counter);
    if(counter < maximum){
      counter++;
      initializeDelay(counter, maximum);
    }
  }, 1000);
}

The concept here is to set the next setTimeout(.. within a timeout. Feel free to adjust it and change the duration of timeouts as needed.

Hopefully this explanation is helpful :)

Implementing Angular 4 setTimeout() function with dynamic delay and wait periods

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

Answer №4

Answer №5

Similar questions

Retrieving dates from a database and populating them into a jQuery UI Picker using PHP

Exploring connections between various objects using JavaScript

Vue.js HTML not refreshing after axios request changes object property

How to programmatically open a new tab in Internet Explorer 7

Encountering an error with type mismatch for style transform properties while using react-native-reanimated

What could be causing the need for RxJs TypeScript files to be requested exclusively when my website is hosted on IIS?

Exploring the integration of Angular framework with Laravel

Attempting to initiate an AJAX request to an API

Troubleshooting problem with nested object in AngularJS data table

Displaying text when hovering the mouse over an element

Having trouble showing information in primeng treetable, and encountering issues with response data returning as undefined when logged in console

Looking to Search For a String Using Regex in Javascript?

Is there a way to determine if the browser window is currently in use?

Error: The server is unable to process the POST request to /api

Bring in a video file in order to watch it on your web page (HTML)

What are the steps to fix the configuration error caused by IIS?

ReactJs Error: Unable to access property value because it is undefined (trying to read '0')

Tips for implementing validation in template-driven form using Ionic 3

Nuxt template failing to render properly

Angular: Simplifying nested array filtering