Tips for handling various mandatory fields for two different user roles within a unified userModel.ts file on a Next.js and MongoDB user registration API platform

Question

Tips for handling various mandatory fields for two different user roles within a unified userModel.ts file on a Next.js and MongoDB user registration API platform

Could you please review my code and provide any suggestions for improvement? I have two types of user roles, candidate and business, each with multiple unique fields. My goal is to consolidate all these fields into one userModel.ts file.

import mongoose from 'mongoose';

const userSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
  email: {
    type: String,
    required: true,
    unique: true,
  },
  password: {
    type: String,
    required: true,
  },
  role: {
    type: String,
    enum: ['candidate', 'business'],
    required: true,
  },
  // ... Other common fields for both roles
  // Define optional specific fields for each role (if any)
  candidateSpecific?: {
    // Candidate-specific fields (optional)
  },
  businessSpecific?: {
    // Business-specific fields (optional)
  },
});

export default mongoose.models.users || mongoose.model('users', userSchema);

javascript typescript mongodb next.js model

Answer 1

Answer №1

Indeed, there are several enhancements you can implement to better manage the specific fields for each role. Utilizing Mongoose's mixed type for role-specific fields and ensuring they are only required or present based on the user's role can streamline the process.

Also, don't forget to utilize the pre method to define the user's role.

import mongoose, { Schema, Document } from 'mongoose';

interface IUser extends Document {
  email: string;
  password: string;
  role: 'candidate' | 'business';
  candidateSpecific?: {
    // Define candidate-specific fields here
    resume?: string;
    portfolio?: string;
  };
  businessSpecific?: {
    // Define business-specific fields here
    companyName?: string;
    companyWebsite?: string;
  };
}

const userSchema = new Schema<IUser>({
  email: {
    type: String,
    required: true,
    unique: true,
  },
  password: {
    type: String,
    required: true,
  },
  role: {
    type: String,
    enum: ['candidate', 'business'],
    required: true,
  },
  candidateSpecific: {
    type: Schema.Types.Mixed,
    default: {},
  },
  businessSpecific: {
    type: Schema.Types.Mixed,
    default: {},
  },
});

userSchema.pre('save', function (next) {
  const user = this as IUser;

  if (user.role === 'candidate') {
    user.businessSpecific = undefined;
  } else if (user.role === 'business') {
    user.candidateSpecific = undefined;
  }

  next();
});

export default mongoose.models.User || mongoose.model<IUser>('User', userSchema);

By following this approach, you can create instances like the following:

 const newUser = new User({
    email: 'example@example.com',
    password: 'securepassword',
    role: 'candidate',
    candidateSpecific: {
      resume: 'link_to_resume',
      portfolio: 'link_to_portfolio',
    },
  });
  
  
   const newUser = new User({
    email: 'info@company.com',
    password: 'securepassword',
    role: 'business',
    businessSpecific: {
      companyName: 'Company Inc.',
      companyWebsite: 'https://company.com',
    },
  });

Answer 2

Indeed, there are several enhancements you can implement to better manage the specific fields for each role. Utilizing Mongoose's mixed type for role-specific fields and ensuring they are only required or present based on the user's role can streamline the process.

Also, don't forget to utilize the pre method to define the user's role.

import mongoose, { Schema, Document } from 'mongoose';

interface IUser extends Document {
  email: string;
  password: string;
  role: 'candidate' | 'business';
  candidateSpecific?: {
    // Define candidate-specific fields here
    resume?: string;
    portfolio?: string;
  };
  businessSpecific?: {
    // Define business-specific fields here
    companyName?: string;
    companyWebsite?: string;
  };
}

const userSchema = new Schema<IUser>({
  email: {
    type: String,
    required: true,
    unique: true,
  },
  password: {
    type: String,
    required: true,
  },
  role: {
    type: String,
    enum: ['candidate', 'business'],
    required: true,
  },
  candidateSpecific: {
    type: Schema.Types.Mixed,
    default: {},
  },
  businessSpecific: {
    type: Schema.Types.Mixed,
    default: {},
  },
});

userSchema.pre('save', function (next) {
  const user = this as IUser;

  if (user.role === 'candidate') {
    user.businessSpecific = undefined;
  } else if (user.role === 'business') {
    user.candidateSpecific = undefined;
  }

  next();
});

export default mongoose.models.User || mongoose.model<IUser>('User', userSchema);

By following this approach, you can create instances like the following:

 const newUser = new User({
    email: 'example@example.com',
    password: 'securepassword',
    role: 'candidate',
    candidateSpecific: {
      resume: 'link_to_resume',
      portfolio: 'link_to_portfolio',
    },
  });
  
  
   const newUser = new User({
    email: 'info@company.com',
    password: 'securepassword',
    role: 'business',
    businessSpecific: {
      companyName: 'Company Inc.',
      companyWebsite: 'https://company.com',
    },
  });

Answer 3

Answer №2

Your analysis of the data indicates that it would be beneficial to handle candidate and business specific fields with separate models.

However, if you prefer to manage all data within one model, you can utilize Subdocuments and create a function for the required validator to ensure that candidateSpecific fields are present when role is candidate, and businessSpecific fields when role is business.

For instance:

import mongoose from 'mongoose';

// Define candidate schema to handle specific fields for candidates
const candidateSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
    whatBroughtYouToPikle: {
        type: String,
    },
    currentStatus: {
        type: String,
    },
    //...
});

// Define business schema to handle specific fields for businesses
const businessSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
    companyName: {
        type: String,
    },
    companySize: {
        type: String,
    },
    //...
});

// Create a unified user schema to handle all types of users
const userSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
    email: {
        type: String,
        required: true,
        unique: true,
    },
    password: {
        type: String,
        required: true,
    },
    role: {
        type: String,
        enum: ['candidate', 'business'],
        required: true,
    },
    // ... 
    candidateSpecific:{
        type: candidateSchema,
        required: function (){
            return this.role === "candidate";
        }
    },
    businessSpecific: {
        type: businessSchema,
        required: function (){
            return this.role === "business";
        }
    },
});

export default mongoose.models.User || mongoose.model<IUser>('User', userSchema);

Answer 4

Your analysis of the data indicates that it would be beneficial to handle candidate and business specific fields with separate models.

However, if you prefer to manage all data within one model, you can utilize Subdocuments and create a function for the required validator to ensure that candidateSpecific fields are present when role is candidate, and businessSpecific fields when role is business.

For instance:

import mongoose from 'mongoose';

// Define candidate schema to handle specific fields for candidates
const candidateSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
    whatBroughtYouToPikle: {
        type: String,
    },
    currentStatus: {
        type: String,
    },
    //...
});

// Define business schema to handle specific fields for businesses
const businessSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
    companyName: {
        type: String,
    },
    companySize: {
        type: String,
    },
    //...
});

// Create a unified user schema to handle all types of users
const userSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
    email: {
        type: String,
        required: true,
        unique: true,
    },
    password: {
        type: String,
        required: true,
    },
    role: {
        type: String,
        enum: ['candidate', 'business'],
        required: true,
    },
    // ... 
    candidateSpecific:{
        type: candidateSchema,
        required: function (){
            return this.role === "candidate";
        }
    },
    businessSpecific: {
        type: businessSchema,
        required: function (){
            return this.role === "business";
        }
    },
});

export default mongoose.models.User || mongoose.model<IUser>('User', userSchema);

Tips for handling various mandatory fields for two different user roles within a unified userModel.ts file on a Next.js and MongoDB user registration API platform

Answer №1

Answer №2

Similar questions

The compiler throwing an error claiming that the indexOf method is not a valid

How can I style the options and optgroups of a select dropdown with CSS, focusing on padding and margins?

What are the possible reasons for the connection failure between Mongodb collection and your application?

Examining Vuex Mutations using Jest confirms no alteration in state

Issue: "contains method is not supported" in Ionic 2

Is there a way to show additional information beyond just the title in FullCalendar?

Eliminate screen flickering during initial page load

Updating a div using PHP elements

Error message "Truffle 'Migrations' - cb is not a valid function"

The reset function in Angular's template-driven form does not seem to be functioning properly when implemented using a component

Having trouble with changing text in a link with an onclick event?

Sending JSON data to Flask triggers a 400 Bad Request response

What are the advantages of combining a library (using Rollup or Webpack) instead of simply transpiling it with Babel?

p5.js experiencing issue: Uncaught TypeError - Unable to access property 'transpose3x3' due to null value

Provide the scope to the directive when calling the $uibModal.open method

Determining Date Differences and Applying Query Conditions Simultaneously in Java Mongo Template

Unraveling deeply nested array objects in JSON with Java Script/jQuery

The issue of dynamic select not sending the POST data

Enliven the character limit reaction by incorporating a thrilling shake animation when it reaches

End the HTML page once the Flash (SWF) animation comes to a close