Decorators serve various purposes, such as altering a class, implementing aspect-oriented programming, or enabling simple logging. A decorator can encompass a wide range of functionalities. Currently, the content within the decorator does not affect the type information for the class (although in certain scenarios, it may not be feasible to achieve this modification, but it is achievable in a direct manner).
If there's a need to introduce methods into a class, TypeScript mixins or traditional inheritance could be considered as viable options.
Solution Placeholder
To address your concern, you could introduce an empty method to generate the desired type information:
@decorator
class Test {
constructor() {
this.method();
}
method(): void { }
}
Substitute Constructor
An alternative approach is to substitute the constructor within the decorator - where you insert the method and constructor call into the method within the decorator itself, ensuring the implementation remains intact.
function decorator(target: any) {
const original = target;
const constr: any = (...args) => {
const c: any = () => {
return original.apply(null, args);
}
c.prototype = original.prototype;
c.prototype.method = function () { alert('method');};
const inst = new c();
inst.method();
return inst;
}
constr.prototype = original.prototype;
return constr;
}
@decorator
class Test {
constructor() {
}
}
const test = new Test();
Approach via Inheritance
The standard yet reliable solution involves inheritance (or delegation if inheritance is not preferred):
class HasMethod {
method() {
alert('Method');
}
}
class Test extends HasMethod {
constructor() {
super();
this.method();
}
}
const test = new Test();