Ignore verification of unused parameters

Question

Ignore verification of unused parameters

In my typescript project compilation process, I make use of the noImplicitAny option to ensure that I specify the types for variables and arguments.

However, there are instances where I have unused arguments. For instance:

jQuery.ajaxTransport("+*", function (options: JQueryAjaxSettings) {
  return {
    abort: function (_, callback: JQueryCallback) {

For the first argument of the abort function that I am not interested in, I choose to name it as _ to indicate its insignificance.

I wonder if this is the correct approach in TypeScript, as I couldn't find concrete guidelines on it. My suspicion arises from the fact that only one argument can be named _.

Upon compiling, Typescript displays the error:

error TS7006: Parameter '_' implicitly has an 'any' type.

To resolve this, I could simply type _:any, but it seems excessive for an unused argument.

typescript unused-variables

Answer 1

Answer №1

I encountered a similar issue where I only needed the res parameter when working with express and routing.

router.get('/', function (req, res) { res.end('Bye.'); });

Your method of using '_' is effective, but I have also found success in utilizing this approach as well.

function (_1, _2, _3, onlyThis) { console.log(onlyThis); }

This alternative seems more clear, as solely using '_' could potentially lead to confusion with lodash/underscore usage, and it explicitly highlights that your focus is on the 4th parameter.

Update: It's been a while since I initially shared this solution, and there have been some misconceptions in the comments. Therefore, I wanted to provide further clarification.

The underscore trick remains valuable in Typescript. As mentioned earlier, for instance, when employing express and writing app.get('/', (req, res) => {, a warning 'req' is declared but its value is never read will be displayed. However, by changing it to app.get('/', (_req, res) => {, the warning disappears. You should not encounter the

error TS7006: Parameter 'req' implicitly has an 'any' type.

error, as @types/express typically handles the typing for this parameter automatically.

Update 2: The other solution presented here involving {} for parameters may seem stylish, but it significantly impacts speed. Personally, I advise caution when using it within intensive loops.

Answer 2

I encountered a similar issue where I only needed the res parameter when working with express and routing.

router.get('/', function (req, res) { res.end('Bye.'); });

Your method of using '_' is effective, but I have also found success in utilizing this approach as well.

function (_1, _2, _3, onlyThis) { console.log(onlyThis); }

This alternative seems more clear, as solely using '_' could potentially lead to confusion with lodash/underscore usage, and it explicitly highlights that your focus is on the 4th parameter.

Update: It's been a while since I initially shared this solution, and there have been some misconceptions in the comments. Therefore, I wanted to provide further clarification.

The underscore trick remains valuable in Typescript. As mentioned earlier, for instance, when employing express and writing app.get('/', (req, res) => {, a warning 'req' is declared but its value is never read will be displayed. However, by changing it to app.get('/', (_req, res) => {, the warning disappears. You should not encounter the

error TS7006: Parameter 'req' implicitly has an 'any' type.

error, as @types/express typically handles the typing for this parameter automatically.

Update 2: The other solution presented here involving {} for parameters may seem stylish, but it significantly impacts speed. Personally, I advise caution when using it within intensive loops.

Answer 3

Answer №2

Although I may be arriving late to the party, after trying various solutions, I have found one that consistently works for me:

function ({}={}, {}={}, {}={}, onlyThis) { console.log(onlyThis); }

comparison

While experimenting with solutions like _0, _1, ... I encountered issues with nested functions such as:

function parent(_0, _1, _2) {
  function child(_0, _1, _2) {
    // TypeScript being unhappy about shadowed variables
  }
}

However, using empty objects proved to work seamlessly:

function parent({}, {}, {}) {
  function child({}, {}, {}) {
    // :-)
  }
}

Even when specifying the parameter types like:

function parent({}: number, {}: string, {}: any) {
  function child({}: number, {}: string, {}: any) {
    // :-) x2
  }
}

UPDATE:

Additionally, as mentioned here, assigning default values prevents errors from occurring if the provided parameter is undefined or null.

function parent({}={}, {}={}, {}={}) {
  function child({}={}, {}={}, {}={}) {
    // :-)
  }
}

Answer 4

Although I may be arriving late to the party, after trying various solutions, I have found one that consistently works for me:

function ({}={}, {}={}, {}={}, onlyThis) { console.log(onlyThis); }

comparison

While experimenting with solutions like _0, _1, ... I encountered issues with nested functions such as:

function parent(_0, _1, _2) {
  function child(_0, _1, _2) {
    // TypeScript being unhappy about shadowed variables
  }
}

However, using empty objects proved to work seamlessly:

function parent({}, {}, {}) {
  function child({}, {}, {}) {
    // :-)
  }
}

Even when specifying the parameter types like:

function parent({}: number, {}: string, {}: any) {
  function child({}: number, {}: string, {}: any) {
    // :-) x2
  }
}

UPDATE:

Additionally, as mentioned here, assigning default values prevents errors from occurring if the provided parameter is undefined or null.

function parent({}={}, {}={}, {}={}) {
  function child({}={}, {}={}, {}={}) {
    // :-)
  }
}

Answer 5

Answer №3

While this may seem somewhat sacrilegious, here's a snippet you might find useful:

function test(...[,,,value]){
  console.log(value)
}
test(1,2,3,4) //outputs: 4

Answer 6

While this may seem somewhat sacrilegious, here's a snippet you might find useful:

function test(...[,,,value]){
  console.log(value)
}
test(1,2,3,4) //outputs: 4

Ignore verification of unused parameters

Answer №1

Answer №2

comparison

Answer №3

Similar questions

Are you looking to use the 'any' type instead of the 'Object' type? Angular Services can help you with that

Angular 7: Efficiently Implementing Multiple Cascading Combobox Components

The pipe operator in Angular is failing to function as intended

The filtering feature in the Row Group table of PrimeNG controls is malfunctioning and causing issues with the Dropdown

Utilize key-value pairs to reference variables when importing as a namespace

Ways to modify this request in order to update the current status

Angular is used to call a function that captures a specific div and then waits for the capture to be completed before

Discovering the current date in Angular 8 by utilizing the form builder

Error message indicating that an object may be undefined in a section of code that cannot possibly be reached by an undefined value

Navigating the onSubmit with Formik in React: Tips and Tricks

Is it possible to derive a TypeScript interface from a Mongoose schema without including the 'Document' type?

Breaking down CSV rows and transforming numerical data (Typescript, Javascript)

Steps to resolve the error "The value for '--target' option should be one of the following: 'es3', 'es5', 'es6', 'es2015', 'es2016', 'es2017', 'es2018', 'es2019', 'es2020', 'es201', 'esnext'."

Mastering Typescript generics for accurate mapping between keys and values through indirection

"Unsubscribing in Angular via a button click: A step-by

Implementing an interface in TypeScript and assigning it a value using generics?

Issue: The error message "TypeError: React.createContext is not a function" occurs when using Next.js 13 alongside Formik with TypeScript

Code coverage analysis in a node.js TypeScript project consistently shows no coverage metrics

I am struggling to figure out why NativeWind props are not being recognized in my tsx file

What is the correct way to properly enter a Svelte component instance variable?