Allow TypeScript in VSCode to locate files that do not contain a default export statement

Question

Allow TypeScript in VSCode to locate files that do not contain a default export statement

To activate the Quick Fix feature for all files when encountering the error message

'Cannot find name 'myUtil'.ts(2304)'

, there is a need to tweak TypeScript settings. While TypeScript excels at recognizing files that have export default MyComponent with names like MyComponent.tsx, it falls short when it comes to files containing only

export const myFunction = () => {}

inside filenames such as utils/my-util.ts. In such cases, the code snippet

myUtil.myFunction()

triggers an error without offering the Quick Fix option:

'Cannot find name 'myUtil'.ts(2304)'

Typically, Quick Fix would add:

import MyComponent from 'components/MyComponent'

However, this behavior doesn't seem to apply when trying to import using:

import * as myUtil from 'utils/my-util'

How can VSCode be configured to enable the Quick Fix functionality for files lacking default exports and not following the same naming conventions for both export and import? Would changing filenames to match imported names - e.g., utils/myUtil - or exporting a default object containing all exports instead of individual ones make any difference?

typescript visual-studio-code

Answer 1

Answer №1

If you want to streamline your code, one option could be to encapsulate your functions within a default export like this:

export default const myUtilities {
    foo() {},
    bar() {}
}

Another approach is to directly import the functions and use them in your code:

import { bar } from 'utilities/my-functions'

When using the function foo, a Quick Fix prompt may suggest adding it to the import statement for 'my-functions'.

By utilizing

import <alias> as <newAlias> from

, you have the flexibility to rename your imports within your file. However, if your imported module has no specific name, you can use import * as <alias>. In cases where there is no named default export, VSCode will require manual naming during import.

In conclusion, achieving automatic filename consideration in this scenario may not be possible with current tools.

Answer 2

If you want to streamline your code, one option could be to encapsulate your functions within a default export like this:

export default const myUtilities {
    foo() {},
    bar() {}
}

Another approach is to directly import the functions and use them in your code:

import { bar } from 'utilities/my-functions'

When using the function foo, a Quick Fix prompt may suggest adding it to the import statement for 'my-functions'.

By utilizing

import <alias> as <newAlias> from

, you have the flexibility to rename your imports within your file. However, if your imported module has no specific name, you can use import * as <alias>. In cases where there is no named default export, VSCode will require manual naming during import.

In conclusion, achieving automatic filename consideration in this scenario may not be possible with current tools.

Allow TypeScript in VSCode to locate files that do not contain a default export statement

Answer №1

Similar questions

Classify Express v4 router as a class

"Discovering the root cause of Angular memory leaks and resolving them effectively is crucial for

Potential Unspecified Array References in Typescript Strict Mode

Effective implementation of Ts.ED BullMQ during server initialization

Two-way conditional type mapping

Using Typescript and React to retrieve the type of a variable based on its defined type

What are the steps to implement the `serialport` library in `deno`?

Is there a way to transform individual data into a collective group dataset?

Utilizing TypeScript for parameter typing in React Router's URLs

Unlocking $refs with the Composition API in Vue3 - A step-by-step guide

The MaterialTable component is indicating that there is no property called 'tableData' on the IPerson type

There seems to be a contradiction in my code - I am returning a Promise but TypeScript is throwing an error saying that the

Error: Undefined object trying to access 'vibrate' property

Setting up ReactJS and TypeScript in a fresh MVC5 project from scratch

Using TypeScript and NestJs: Spread types can only be generated from object types

Is there a way to access a value from one observer within another observer?

Even when it appears to be chaotic, the TypeScript array of numbers always manages to find its way back to being sorted

Tips for accurately defining prop types in next.js when utilizing typescript?

Contrasting {} and {} as any in TypeScript

Is there a way to implement a pipe function in TypeScript?