What is the solution for resolving the no-unsafe-any rule?

Question

What is the solution for resolving the no-unsafe-any rule?

Currently incorporating TSLint for maintaining the quality of my Angular TypeScript code. I've opted to activate the 'no-unsafe-any' rule from TSLint, as it appears beneficial to avoid making assumptions about properties with type 'any'.

An issue has arisen where this rule is flagging errors in some sections of my code that I am struggling to rectify without disabling the rule altogether. An example snippet of code that violates this rule is provided below.

public intercept(request: HttpRequest<{}>, next: HttpHandler): Observable<HttpEvent<{}>> {
  return next
    .handle(request)
    .pipe(
      catchError(error => {
        if (error && error.status === httpCodeUnauthorized) {
          // Auto logout if unathorized
          this.authenticationService.logout();
        }

        const errorMessage = (error.error && error.error.message) || error.statusText;

        return throwError(errorMessage);
      }),
    );
}

The linter is showing 4 errors across 2 lines:

ERROR: /home/robert/programming/npc/gui/src/app/core/authentication/unauthorized.interceptor.ts[24, 24]: Unsafe use of expression of type 'any'.
ERROR: /home/robert/programming/npc/gui/src/app/core/authentication/unauthorized.interceptor.ts[29, 33]: Unsafe use of expression of type 'any'.
ERROR: /home/robert/programming/npc/gui/src/app/core/authentication/unauthorized.interceptor.ts[29, 48]: Unsafe use of expression of type 'any'.
ERROR: /home/robert/programming/npc/gui/src/app/core/authentication/unauthorized.interceptor.ts[29, 72]: Unsafe use of expression of type 'any'

The problematic lines are:

if (error && error.status === httpCodeUnauthorized) {

const errorMessage = (error.error && error.error.message) || error.statusText;

The main challenge originates from the fact that the error parameter in the handler passed to the catchError function from the RxJS library has a type of 'any'. While acknowledging that error could be of any type, I am taking precautions by verifying the existence of its properties before utilizing them, which I believe makes the code safe.

Is there a recommended approach to persuading the linter and TypeScript compiler that the code adheres to safety standards and satisfies the rule?

typescript tslint typescript-types

Answer 1

Answer №1

When dealing with Angular errors, it is crucial to ensure that the error type is always an instance of HttpErrorResponse.

catchError((error: HttpErrorResponse) => {
//...
}

Furthermore, when accessing error.error in your code, keep in mind that it is defined as type any within HttpErrorResponse. Therefore, it is advisable to use a type guard to validate and cast it to an Error object. It is unnecessary to explicitly define the Error type as it is already part of TypeScript's base types.

function isError(value: any | undefined): value is Error {
  return error && ((error as Error).message !== undefined);
}

Subsequently, you can utilize this function in your code:

const errorMessage = isError(error.error) ? error.error.message : error.statusText;

Answer 2

When dealing with Angular errors, it is crucial to ensure that the error type is always an instance of HttpErrorResponse.

catchError((error: HttpErrorResponse) => {
//...
}

Furthermore, when accessing error.error in your code, keep in mind that it is defined as type any within HttpErrorResponse. Therefore, it is advisable to use a type guard to validate and cast it to an Error object. It is unnecessary to explicitly define the Error type as it is already part of TypeScript's base types.

function isError(value: any | undefined): value is Error {
  return error && ((error as Error).message !== undefined);
}

Subsequently, you can utilize this function in your code:

const errorMessage = isError(error.error) ? error.error.message : error.statusText;

Answer 3

Answer №2

When faced with the dilemma of determining the specific type of an error, there are two paths you can take. The first option is to simply annotate the type if you are confident in its specificity. However, if uncertainty looms, utilizing a type guard might be the better approach.

Utilizing Type Annotation

Type annotation allows you to clearly indicate to the compiler the expected type of the error. This method entirely eliminates the need for utilizing the "any" type:

interface Error {
    status: string,
    statusText: string,
    error: { message: string | undefined } | undefined;
}

catchError((error: Error | undefined) => {
    //...
}

Implementing a Type Guard

A type guard comes into play when a value could potentially be of a certain type but does not exclusively have to be of that type. By using a type guard, the type will be checked and within the subsequent block, the variable will assume the identified type:

function isError(value: any | undefined): value is Error {
    return error && ((error as Error).status !== undefined);
}

catchError(error => {
    if (isError(error)) {
        //Within this block, the variable 'error' will be recognized as type Error
    }
}

Answer 4

When faced with the dilemma of determining the specific type of an error, there are two paths you can take. The first option is to simply annotate the type if you are confident in its specificity. However, if uncertainty looms, utilizing a type guard might be the better approach.

Utilizing Type Annotation

Type annotation allows you to clearly indicate to the compiler the expected type of the error. This method entirely eliminates the need for utilizing the "any" type:

interface Error {
    status: string,
    statusText: string,
    error: { message: string | undefined } | undefined;
}

catchError((error: Error | undefined) => {
    //...
}

Implementing a Type Guard

A type guard comes into play when a value could potentially be of a certain type but does not exclusively have to be of that type. By using a type guard, the type will be checked and within the subsequent block, the variable will assume the identified type:

function isError(value: any | undefined): value is Error {
    return error && ((error as Error).status !== undefined);
}

catchError(error => {
    if (isError(error)) {
        //Within this block, the variable 'error' will be recognized as type Error
    }
}

What is the solution for resolving the no-unsafe-any rule?

Answer №1

Answer №2

Similar questions

Retrieve a specific element from an array list

Tips for incorporating SectionList sections in React Native using an array

The compatibility of return value types between the constructor signature and the call signature interface is not maintained when they are used together

What is the process for configuring React on one server and springboot on a separate server?

Error: Trying to modify a property that is set as read-only while attempting to override the toString() function

Eliminate nested object properties using an attribute in JavaScript

The content security policy is preventing a connection to the signalr hub

Creating a TypeScript NPM package that provides JSX property suggestions and autocomplete functionality for Intellisense

React Material-UI is notorious for its sluggish performance

Merging declarations fails to function properly following the release of the npm module

Creating a null array of a specific size can easily be accomplished in Typescript

After verifying the variable is an Array type, it is ideal to utilize the .forEach()

Avoid selecting primary key column in TypeORM查询

What are the best practices for transpiling code using Parcel-bundler?

Encountering a TS1005 error while trying to import types from a type definition file

Ways to modify the datepicker format in Angular Material

What is the best approach to implement server-side rendering in Next.js while utilizing Apollo React hooks for fetching data from the backend?

Exploring Parquet Files with Node.js

Using `await` inside an if block does not change the type of this expression

Neglecting the inclusion of a property when verifying for empty properties